"How Economist Thomas Sowell’s Warning About Combating Racial Disparities Came True"
"How to Prevent Mosquito and Bug Bites"

"The Age of the Essay"

Interesting exposition by Paul Graham of one reason why high school and college English is taught so badly. Excerpt:

Defending a position may be a necessary evil in a legal dispute, but it's not the best way to get at the truth, as I think lawyers would be the first to admit. It's not just that you miss subtleties this way. The real problem is that you can't change the question.

And yet this principle is built into the very structure of the things they teach you to write in high school. The topic sentence is your thesis, chosen in advance, the supporting paragraphs the blows you strike in the conflict, and the conclusion-- uh, what is the conclusion? I was never sure about that in high school. It seemed as if we were just supposed to restate what we said in the first paragraph, but in different enough words that no one could tell. Why bother? But when you understand the origins of this sort of "essay," you can see where the conclusion comes from. It's the concluding remarks to the jury.

Link courtesy of reader JK.

Two more of Graham's essays on writing are quite worthwhile: "Write Simply" and "Writing, Briefly".

Comments