Subscribe in a reader





Udemy courses

Economics posters





Buy Conservative Advertising

Top Economics Site

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

September 10, 2014

"The new face of country music is young, female, and feminist"

I think I need to sell bro country short

Country music is supposed to tell a story. The stories that many of the genre's current leading men tell are filled with short denim shorts, bikini tops, and objectification. In these stories, women are submissive, passive, and exist to be pursued. But the rising women of country aren't any of those things. Their songs are still lyric-heavy, full of twang, and powerful, but instead of stories about loves won and lost, they're singing about misogyny and gender stereotyping. They aren't the first women in country to do so, but they're certainly leading a new, more direct feminist country charge.

"Syllabus Tyrannus"

"The decline and fall of the American university is written in 25-page course syllabi."

I absolutely concur with the observation. But I don't think she's got the causality right. It's a function of the huge growth of administrators, many of whom have it's-not-our-problem-we-warned-you (aka "cover your ass") as a primary objective.

Five on Los Angeles

"26 Things You Will Only See In Los Angeles".

"Los Angeles’s Great Flood: The city’s infrastructure crumbles as public-employee compensation balloons."

"15 Things You Learn in Your First 5 Years in L.A."

"A Blast from the Past: Los Angeles from 1898 Till the 1960's".

"The Urban Oil Fields of Los Angeles".

September 09, 2014

"Rand Paul’s Fatal Pacifism"

Richard Epstein masterfully explains why libertarianism does not imply isolationism.

The just state should, in my opinion, protect private property, promote voluntary exchange, preserve domestic order, and protect our nation against foreign aggression. Unfortunately, too many modern libertarian thinkers fail to grasp the enormity of that last obligation. In the face of international turmoil, they become cautious and turn inward, confusing limited government with small government. Unwisely, they demand that the United States keep out of foreign entanglements unless and until they pose direct threats to its vital interests—at which point it could be too late.

"Don’t do what you love"

Unusual but persuasive advice. You can't argue, at least, with this bit:

We rarely hear the advice of the person who did what they loved and stayed poor or was horribly injured for it. Professional gamblers, stuntmen, washed up cartoonists like myself: we don’t give speeches at corporate events. We aren’t paid to go to the World Domination Summit and make people feel bad. We don’t land book deals or speak on Good Morning America.

"It’s won’t be long before US debt is out of control"

By Rebecca Strauss, Associate director of publications, Council on Foreign Relations. Note that Liberals think we should alwayts imitate Europe (home of fine Lefty solutions to all public policy problems).

Except when we shouldn't:

All advanced countries have faced similar challenges in controlling government debt and most have made austerity cuts that have slowed economic growth and employment in the short term. But, surprisingly, Europe—despite facing more difficult decisions than those confronting Washington—has done far more to bring their long-term debt burden under control.

Related: "Budget Crash Likely, Not Predicted Deficit Cuts".

"Job requirements are mostly fiction and you should ignore them"

I kinda suspected this, but it's nice to see some confirmation.

Hiring managers get overexcited and list too many things, even though only a few parts of the description are truly core. But the term “requirement” gets read very literally, and scares people off from jobs they could well get. Purcell actually doesn’t like to send specific job descriptions to clients for exactly that reason. The hiring process still is a very human one. Things like relationships, confidence, less definite skills, and proper presentation of experience make a difference and often can help candidates overcome a perceived shortage in qualifications.

"Supply issues could hamper the U.S. economy"

Don't look now but Larry Summers seems to be halfway to becoming a supply-sider.

To achieve growth of even 2 percent a year over the next decade, active support for demand will be necessary but not sufficient. In the United States, as in Europe and Japan, structural reform — to both increase the productivity of workers and capital and to increase the number of people able and willing to work productively — is essential.

September 08, 2014

"The Public Choice Revolution in the Textbooks"

James Gwartney laments that more economics textbooks don't treat Public Choice sufficiently

I am nonetheless disappointed that public choice has exerted so little impact on mainstream economics. Rather than analyzing how both markets and collective decisionmaking handle economic problems, mainstream economics continues to model government as if it were an omniscient, benevolent social planner available to impose ideal solutions. The highly successful text of Greg Mankiw illustrates this point. Mankiw introduces his discussion of the role of government and the correction of market deficiencies in the following manner: To evaluate market outcomes, we introduce into our analysis a new, hypothetical character called the benevolent social planner. The benevolent social planner is an all-knowing, all-powerful, wellintentioned dictator. The planner wants to maximize the economic well-being of everyone in society.

(Professor Gwartney is co-author of an excellent text--now in its 15th edition--that very much does: Economics: Private and Public ChoiceThe principles text co-authored by John Taylor of Stanford also does a good job.)

I think if there was one thing I could change about current economics teaching, it would be to incorporate much more Public Choice at all levels, from principles on up. I'd have the students read, for example, pieces like "When the Basic Income Guarantee Meets the Political Process". And I'd invite them to understand exactly why there's been "Four Decades of Declining Trust in D.C."

"Humans Need Not Apply"

The robots are here . . . and lots more are coming. This video makes a reasonable case for trouble. It's more than a simple-minded Luddite screed, and while I think history strongly suggests optimism, I think the video's arguments are worth considering. (Link via Kottke.)

More warnings: "Here Are Some Jobs That Are Basically Guaranteed To Be Taken Over By Robots" and "The best-case scenario for automation? Still worrisome for workers".

Arguments both optimistic and pessimistic: "Here's How Robots Could Change The World By 2025".

Two optimistic pieces: "One Paragraph Cuts Through The Hype Of Robots Taking Your Job" and "Will artificial intelligence destroy humanity? Here are 5 reasons not to worry."

Finally, a video by noted MIT professor Erik Brynjolfsson that frames the debate, I think, correctly: "The key to growth? Race with the machines".

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog