Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« One more reason to think about getting a second opinion | Main | "The hangover doctor who can cure you in 45 minutes" »

May 05, 2014

"Behold the Democratic Future, Boasts Jonathan Chait, Because Suspicion of Government Is Racist"

The reductio ad absurdum of a main Liberal preoccupation: "America’s unique brand of ideological anti-statism is historically inseparable . . . from the legacy of slavery." 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ErisGuy

Socialism is historically-inseparable from slavery.

Les Cargill


Hey, you got Federalism on my Jim Crow laws!
Hey, you got Jim Crow laws on my Federalism!

So it's not *UNREASONABLE* - there is stretched logic to it - but it seems ...
unproductive. Barry Goldwater was on the wrong side of history in '64. You
pay for that sort of mistake. That funk travels with the word "libertarian"
today ( although libertarians that can read would have *OPPOSED* any such
thing, I would think - underestimating always the power of bad ideas... ).

That Jim Crow stood as law seems to pretty much make Chait's point. If he'd stopped there... The rest is bayoneting the wounded. That Jim Crow laws were a petulant Lost Causer horror is abundantly obvious.

Self evident. If it's not then it's Huckleberry Finn evident and that's as good as it gets. Now *THAT* was a reducito to be reckoned with. "I'd rather be damned than deny my friend's humanity." You betcha, Huck.

But wait... wasn't a Jim Crow law a ... government... mechanism? To a limit and in a time, it was Federally *sanctioned* legal mechanism. Before St. LBJ smote the evil with his pen, that is...

Huh. How about that?

Now *THAT*, sir is a reductio.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog