"Well Done, Washington! Your Stupid New Rules Have Made Banks Refuse To Serve Poor People"
The mighty Law of Unintended Consequences strikes yet again.
No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.
« Y'all come | Main | "Prof or Hobo?" »
February 21, 2013
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Posts
- "Every Noise at Once"
- Either a sign of the apocalypse or another (small) reason why capitalism is wonderful
- Best six year-old drummer I've seen
- "Newegg nukes 'corporate troll' Alcatel in third patent appeal win this year"
- The estimate for annual maintenance: $75 million
- "The true meaning of moral panics"
- "Tumour tests help predict best cancer treatments"
- The new hotness in NYC K-12 education
- "The Upper Class and Wealth Inequality in Sweden"
- This is fun
The Door's Top 15 Posts on Economics
- Economics chutzpah award
- Again, the dopey idea that choice makes us worse off
- Excellent piece by Arnold Kling on 60s Liberals
- The Wall Street Journal seems to be mistaken about economists' pay
- Some notes on comparable worth
- Is Finland really that wonderful?
- Are Americans too stupid to save for retirement?
- Joseph Stiglitz makes either a bad joke or a mistake
- Where "unilateral effects" theory is leading the FTC
- Steve Margolis explains why people don't walk up escalators
- Recent research on economic growth
- J. Sanchez answers the charge that belief in free markets is like a religion
- A brief reply to What’s Wrong with Economics?
- Did GM destroy urban mass transit in America?
- Beating the NCAA tourney pool using economics
The Door's Top 12 Posts on Other Topics
- A dopey idea from John Edwards
- Book Tag
- Brilliant essay on the (mis)teaching of high school English
- I highly recommend the new movie Spellbound
- Leon Kass’s defense of dying is wrong
- The Door simplifies the NY Times’s complicated explanation for why Honda is successful.
- The Door's list of the Top 25 Movie Scenes of All Time
- The political affiliations of the American professorate
- Things about college admissions I had not known
- Walter C. Willett’s Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy
- Why I oppose complete drug legalization
- Why teenagers shouldn't trust adults, reason #2931
Links
- 1-2 Knockout
- A Stitch in Haste
- Admissions Quest
- AtlanticBlog
- Betsy's Page
- Blog CRM
- Blog News Channel
- Bluematter
- Bryant Smith--Florida web designer
- Canadian Private Schools
- Change of Address
- Chicago Boyz
- Club for Growth
- Cold Spring Shops
- Conservative Grapevine
- Crackerjack Finance
- CRM Lowdown
- Daily Vegetable
- Division of Labour
- Dr. T's EconLinks
- EclectEcon
- Econlog
- Economics Internet Library
- Economics Roundtable
- Edugree
- Environmental Economics
- Espresso Pundit
- ForexFraud
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Houston's Clear Thinkers
- I Will Teach You To Be Rich
- Information on Local Schools
- Kids Prefer Cheese
- Knowledge Problem
- Mahalanobis
- MainStreet
- Marginal Revolution
- Market Power
- MarketObservation.com
- My Boarding School
- Newspapers--Online Newspapers Directory
- North State Blogs
- Nursing Home Abuse
- Oil Prices & Energy News: Crude Oil Price Charts, Investment Advice
- Pat Larkin's Value Journal
- Political Calculations
- Private School Review
- QandO - Free Markets, Free People
- Right Wing News
- SCSUScholars
- Sports Economist
- StockBlogs
- The Emirates Economist
- The Fledgling Economist
- The Link Kills Spam
- Tim Worstall
- Tom Rants
- Town Called Dobson
- Treatment Online
- Voluntary Xchange
- Web Directory
- Education News
- Whototake
Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003
Member since 07/2003
Not unintended. Invisible rules affect the poor, enable community organizers to stir up trouble, enrage the class warriors. Completely intended.
Posted by: ErisGuy | February 21, 2013 at 06:44 AM
When they do help the poor (think Community Reinvestment Act) and the SHTF, they get sued by the very entity that demanded they serve the poor. It's a lose lose...
Posted by: Paul | February 21, 2013 at 08:07 AM
I have to agree, these things are well known, they are no unintended consequences. These people really want to create a dependent underclass and destroy the private economy as much as possible.
Posted by: kyle8 | February 23, 2013 at 06:30 PM