"Cacao or Caca? How the media bit into chocolate Nobel prize link"
Whether it was satire or ginormous bogosity, it shouldn't have gotten anywhere near the publicity it did.
« "Researchers Admit That Flu Shots Might Not Actually Work In Everyone" | Main | "No Matter Who Wins On 11/6, Disgruntled Americans Will Move To . . . Sweden" »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Correlation ain't causation. And there's very little correlation here.
Posted by: Joe R. | November 05, 2012 at 06:03 AM
It's hard to say if it's tongue-in-cheek or whether the researcher truly is clueless about how to analyze non-experimental data (would not be surprised, given what other rubbish gets published in journals that usually deal with experimental data).
He says ''I've presented it to a few of my colleagues, and nobody has any thoughts.'' No thoughts? How about asking one of your undergrad students who has taken a Stats 101 or intro econometrics course to teach you something?
Posted by: Jack | November 05, 2012 at 08:58 AM
Spoilsport!
Posted by: Paul Jaminet | November 05, 2012 at 01:35 PM