Subscribe in a reader
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner
« "Researchers Admit That Flu Shots Might Not Actually Work In Everyone" |
| "No Matter Who Wins On 11/6, Disgruntled Americans Will Move To . . . Sweden" »
Posted by Craig on 05:40:00 AM in Economics
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Correlation ain't causation. And there's very little correlation here.
Joe R. |
November 05, 2012 at 06:03 AM
It's hard to say if it's tongue-in-cheek or whether the researcher truly is clueless about how to analyze non-experimental data (would not be surprised, given what other rubbish gets published in journals that usually deal with experimental data).
He says ''I've presented it to a few of my colleagues, and nobody has any thoughts.'' No thoughts? How about asking one of your undergrad students who has taken a Stats 101 or intro econometrics course to teach you something?
November 05, 2012 at 08:58 AM
Paul Jaminet |
November 05, 2012 at 01:35 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Find new books and literate friends with Shelfari, the online book club.