Atlantic asks, "What if modern, postindustrial society is simply better suited to women?"
I've long thought that unless you need someone to risk his neck to kill a whole lot of people he doesn't know--for which you probably want a man--women, as a group, are better human beings than men. So I'd give better than 50-50 odds that the trend discussed in the article will continue for at least some time.
UPDATE. Louis CK: "I don't think women are better than men. Men are a lot worse than women, though." (About the 2:16 mark.)
But the very same issue of Atlantic reveals an important limit to women's superiority:
The reason so many women love him [John F. Kennedy] really has nothing to do with his actual accomplishments and everything to do with his being the kind of man whose every inclination runs counter to their best interests. If history—to say nothing of fictional characters, including the Dons, Draper and Juan—has taught us anything, it is that a significant number of women are desperately, often tragically, attracted to that very trait. . . .
All the aging hookers and cast-aside girlfriends with book contracts better take notice: We don’t care about you. JFK is more important to us than you can ever be, so you might as well keep quiet. The cause endures, sweetheart. The hope still lives. And the dream will never die.
Funny and sad at the same time.