Hope and change I support
I favor cutting high school by one year, or college by one year, or both, for at least some students. More and more other folks think the same way.
« Sandra Bullock in the The Blind Side | Main | Two warnings that the Chinese economy will probably slow »
I favor cutting high school by one year, or college by one year, or both, for at least some students. More and more other folks think the same way.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
As far as I can tell, this route is already available to students willing to work the system. I'm not particularly intelligent nor ambitious, but here's how I shaved a semester off of high school, and potentially 3 semesters off an engineering degree in college:
I went to school in Alaska in the early 90s. I took college classes after school starting my sophomore year, and I graduated a semester early from high school. I did have to take a "summer school" PE class (jump-roping, if you must know) to fulfill my PE requirement.
The courses I took at University of Alaska, if I remember correctly, were Trig, Calc 1, Calc 2, Calc 3, Advanced Calc, Linear Algebra, Differential Equations, Philosophy, and a couple programming classes. Meanwhile in high school I took AP Physics, AP Econ, AP English, AP History, 5 years of French (including junior high) and 4 years of Japanese.
In total I was able to transfer 39 credits (about 1.5 years) worth of credits into University of Michigan. I could have transferred more if I'd applied myself to entrance tests.
I'd guess in total my parents paid about $2000 for the UAA classes, and the savings at U of M was in the neighborhood of $40,000.
Posted by: anonymous | March 02, 2010 at 10:47 AM
Not the same thing, but Quebec has had for many years the following system: 11 years of school (ending with a high school diploma), 2 years of junior college (with a terminal degree that has little value by itself), and 3 years of university for a BA/BSc. I am not sure the system is better, but for economists who believe in signalling, I think it creates more easily a meaningful separating equilibrium. Note that you can, as I did, finish HS in Quebec then go to university elsewhere, saving one year of time and money.
Posted by: Jack | March 02, 2010 at 05:31 PM
A few years ago I tutored a young woman in econ and statistics who'd left high school after her sophomore year for a three year community college program (in Washington state)that produced a high school diploma plus two years of credits acceptable at the Univ. of Washington.
She had her BA before she was 21.
Posted by: Patrick R. Sullivan | March 02, 2010 at 07:56 PM
While not everyone is, probably, equipped [in more ways than one] to finish HS in 3 years or less, we frequently deliberately make it difficult to do so in order to continue to receive one or another kind of funding. Perhaps school systems should be paid a bonus for students who can graduate in 3 years and pass some standardized tests.
[My parents refused to allow me to skip grades, but I was loaded up with extra reading, even in a very rural school system and loaded up with academci classes in HS. Oddly enough, years later I'm most glad that I took HS courses in basic bookkeeping and typing. Those serve me well today. I also enjoyed the shop classes, but I don't use those skills so much any more.]
Posted by: JorgXMcKie | March 03, 2010 at 03:42 PM
What most Californians don't know is that the standards for high school graduation are incredibly low. When I was registering for my senior classes I realized that all I had to do to graduate a semester early was take an English elective. I could have skipped an entire year if I knew what the requirements were.
Posted by: michael | March 03, 2010 at 10:44 PM