Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« Cool online course | Main | "The AP Economic Stress Index" »

October 26, 2009

"Are Ivy League Schools Fudging Their Numbers?"

Journalist Lynn O'Shaughnessy seems to have caught a few bastions of higher education stretching the truth:

Here’s one of the egregious examples: Stanford reported to the U.S. Department of Education that 54% of its professors are full time. But Stanford told U.S. News & World Report that 99% of its faculty are full time. Huh?

The University of Pennsylvania informed the federal government that 52% of its faculty are full timers, but it told US News that 86% were. Princeton and Harvard’s magazine stats were 92% and 93% respectively, but its federal numbers were 79% and 83%.

Duke was the only university in US News’ top 10 university list that reported consistent figures to both entities. The school says that 97% of its faculty are full time.

(Maybe it's an issue of different definitions? I don't know.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef0120a62e5952970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Are Ivy League Schools Fudging Their Numbers?":

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog