Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« "Why Your Car Isn't Selling -- Econ 101" | Main | Always remember . . . »

April 30, 2009

Good point

Holman Jenkins, yesterday's Wall Street Journal:

When the L.A. Times wrote [nearly 25 years ago], the labor cost differential versus a Japanese plant was about $2,000 per car. Twenty years later, the cost difference was about $2,000 per car. Today's lament is, "The bankers have benefited from a bailout, so why shouldn't auto workers?" But they have, they have -- for decades. For the business model described above could not possibly have survived otherwise.

The U.S. auto industry sounds so very Atlas Shrugged: one government "fix" leads to another which leads to another, and pretty soon you have a big, intractable mess.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef0115705d6a2a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Good point:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

JorgXMcKie

All I know is that the UAW members I know (and I know quite a few here in the Detroit suburbs) thinks the UAW 'won'. They don't expect any change for years.

TheBigHenry

A car-maker bankruptcy is a tragedy; a trillion dollar bailout is a statistic.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog