Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« "Collected Advice for the Young Economists" | Main | One more cost of our ever-more-instrusive State »

April 29, 2008

Two on intellectual property

J. K. Rowling sues to prevent a "reference guide" to Harry Potter from being published.

"Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents".

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e551e687e18834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two on intellectual property:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

kyle N

Rowling has the right to do this, But it might not be in her best interest. Subsidiary products greatly enhance the value of any franchise. Paramount Pictures, for years allowed stories and reference guides about its Star Trek property sometimes only by a person writing and asking for permission. It paid off
later by making Star Trek one of the most successful entertainment franchises in history.

Jake

I am in the software business, and I don't believe in software patents. Almost every software patent I have seen was done 25 years ago by some one else. If someone takes the time to do an investigation, every software patent can be broken by prior use.

The look and feel of software is protected by copyright and that is enough protection.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog