Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« The magic of markets, part 1,353,491 | Main | Kling and Alchian on the value of college »

March 30, 2008

New line

Glenn Reynolds: "Old line: Left-leaning faculty are a right-wing myth. New line: Faculty Are Liberal — Who Cares?"

The link reports on a forthcoming paper that finds students' political orientations don't change "much" in college. The Inside Higher Ed writer than adds that we shouldn't care if university faculty are disproportinately liberal because they apparently aren't affecting students' views.

Reynolds and his readers point out a few flaws in the "who cares" argument. (And their discussion includes this lovely observation: "If the beliefs and attitudes of faculty don't matter, even if they're pretty much a monoculture, then the argument for 'diversity' in general would seem to evaporate.") Dan Klein of George Mason, quoted in the linked article, points out another.

Here's my small contribution. Imagine a parallel Earth on which more than half of American university professors were evangelical Christians. The evangelical biologists don't teach evolution; they teach intelligent design. The evangelical English department focuses on the Bible. Evangelical historians teach that history is pretty much the working out of God's design. Evangelical economists focus on The Wealth of Nations. Etc.

But suppose a study finds that on this paralled Earth college students are no more likely to be evangelical Christians when they graduate than when they entered. Do you think Inside Higher Ed would claim that the Christian orientation of the faculty "didn't matter"?

Take some time to think about it. I'll wait.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e551943d278834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New line:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

kyle N

My view is that the weak minded, or weak willed students are indeed easily manipulated by the academy. On the other hand, a majority of the students will form their own conclusions and some are actually turned away from leftism by the heavy handedness of the professors.

brent

It's not the barrage of one-sided information flung at college students that is the problem in this regard.

It is the absence of information provided to students that would be contrary to faculty opinion that seems troublesome.

If the entire university has faculty that dismisses certain information due to confirmation bias, how are students going to incorporate that information when they are forming opinions / worldviews? If you have faculty with differing opinions about a topic, at least the information is more likely to be discussed.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog