"Limits to Growth" claptrap never dies
Thomas Homer-Dixon, director of the Trudeau Center for Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Toronto, briefly recaps the famous Ehrlich-Simon bet on natural resource prices and then asserts ominously:
But today, it seems, Mr. Ehrlich and his colleagues may have the last (grim) laugh. The debate about limits to growth is coming back with a vengeance. The world’s supply of cheap energy is tightening, and humankind’s enormous output of greenhouse gases is disrupting the earth’s climate. Together, these two constraints could eventually hobble global economic growth and cap the size of the global economy.
After some bogus discussion about falling "energy return on investment"--why are real oil prices lower now then 25 years ago?--Mr. Homer-Dixon concludes:
As the price of energy rises and as the planet gets hotter, we need significantly higher investment in innovation throughout society, from governments and corporations to universities. Perhaps the most urgent step, if humankind is going to return to coal as its major energy source, is to figure out ways of safely disposing of coal’s harmful carbon dioxide — probably underground.
But in the larger sense, we really need to start thinking hard about how our societies — especially those that are already very rich — can maintain their social and political stability, and satisfy the aspirations of their citizens, when we can no longer count on endless economic growth.
Which, of course, utterly misses the late Julian Simon's magnificent point.
And please note, Mr. Homer-Dixon doesn't offer to bet on Simon's proposition.


There is a relatively easy solution already available for our alleged global warming. Two Princeton scientists say that global warming can be solved by the world building 700 nuclear reactors.
So rather than gnashing our teeth and wringing our hands, lets start building. The world needs to be where France is already at-80% of their electricity comes from nuclear power.
I am all for building those reactors as it would solve the real problem of air pollution in third-world countries
Posted by: Jake | November 30, 2006 at 11:10 AM
Any Global Warming Alarmist must come to Jake's conclusion before he/she is taken seriously by me.
Posted by: SR | December 04, 2006 at 12:38 AM
Whats this global warming? We got 12" of snow this last week.
Posted by: rmark | December 04, 2006 at 12:07 PM