Subscribe in a reader






Buy Conservative Advertising

Wikio - Top Blogs

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


No one but the author bears any responsibility for the non-advertising content on this blog. AND PLEASE NOTE: the author neither necessarily uses nor endorses any product advertised on this blog.

« | Main | »

March 31, 2005

Unfortunately, in spite of having a Republican Congress and a Republican President, the U.S. still imposes some significant barriers to international trade. John Palmer amusingly proposes a way that the barriers to U.S.-Canada trade could be elminated.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9b9953ef00e55034fe1d8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Walter Wessels

"In Spite"? I would say "because of". If we had a Republican President and a Democratic congress (or visa versa), my guess is that we would have less growth in government, less interference with international trade, and a freer economy. Comparing the Bush years with the Clinton years (after Clinton was saddled with a Republican Congress) bears this out (that is, far less growth in government). To put it differently, Republicans have proven themselves as bad as Democrats (and perhaps worse) when left alone to do mischief.

John Palmer

Well Canada has just retaliated against the Byrd amendment. A 15% tariff on oysters, cigarettes, and live swine. sheeesh.
http://the-econoclast.blogspot.com/2005/03/smoot-hawley-all-over-again.html

John Chilton

Walter is right of course.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Powered by TypePad
Member since 07/2003

Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog